The strategic imperative of psychological safety and organizational error management

16Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite considerable discussion in the management literature about the need for flexible strategies and agile learning organizations, many-if not most-large organizations and their strategy processes remain top-down, slow to change, and fraught with obstacles to learning. A "strategy-as-learning" approach is presented that contrasts with the dominant conception of strategy-as-planning. Conceptualizing and practicing the work of organizational strategy as a learning process implies that strategy is about developing good questions and thoughtful hypotheses to be tested through execution. This produces a mode of operating called execution-as-learning. Strategy-as-learning requires psychological safety, which enables speaking up, dissenting, error reporting, candidly discussing risks, and practicing organizational error management. Without these behaviors, especially at the executive levels, organizations are at risk of experiencing avoidable strategic failures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edmondson, A. C., & Verdin, P. J. (2018). The strategic imperative of psychological safety and organizational error management. In How Could This Happen?: Managing Errors in Organizations (pp. 81–104). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76403-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free