The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of intussusception: Where best practice reduces the need for surgery

14Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Intussusception may be difficult to diagnose because the classical triad of symptoms is evident at the time of presentation in only about 20% of cases. This may lead to delays in making the correct diagnosis. The most common presenting features are colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, pallor, lethargy and listlessness. In recent years, the algorithms of management of intussusception have changed significantly: a routine plain abdominal X-ray has been replaced by ultrasonography, previously perceived contraindications to attempting an enema reduction no longer apply, gas has largely replaced barium for enema reduction, incomplete initial reduction is an indication for a delayed repeat enema if the child is stable clinically and partial reduction has been achieved, the indications for surgery have been tightened and laparoscopy affords an alternative surgical approach. This commentary expands on the rationale behind some of the recent advances in the management of children who present with suspected intussusception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beasley, S. W. (2017). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of intussusception: Where best practice reduces the need for surgery. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 53(11), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free