Abstract
Aims: Worldwide observational studies are evidencing discordance between guidelines and real-world practice regarding direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) doses. This systematic review summarizes and evaluate DOACs use in real-world practice. Methods: This review was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines searching PubMed (MEDLINE) and Medscape databases. Results: Data from 75 studies showed that most of the patients treated with DOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation received doses in accordance to the guidelines. However, a significant number of patients received off-label doses (25–50% in most of the studies evaluated). DOAC overdosing was associated with increased all-cause mortality and worse bleeding events while underdosing was associated with increased cardiovascular hospitalization and, particularly for apixaban, with a nearly 5-fold increased risk of stroke. Conclusion: Patients prescribed with off-label DOAC doses did not receive the full benefit of anticoagulation and presented an increased risk of stroke, bleeding and/or adverse effects.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Santos, J., António, N., Rocha, M., & Fortuna, A. (2020, March 1). Impact of direct oral anticoagulant off-label doses on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14127
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.