Validating the Strategies Analysis Diagram: Assessing the reliability and validity of a formative method

23Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Strategies Analysis Diagram (SAD) is a recently developed method to model the range of possible strategies available for activities in complex sociotechnical systems. Previous applications of the new method have shown that it can effectively identify a comprehensive range of strategies available to humans performing activity within a particular system. A recurring criticism of Ergonomics methods is however, that substantive evidence regarding their performance is lacking. For a method to be widely used by other practitioners such evaluations are necessary. This article presents an evaluation of criterion-referenced validity and test-retest reliability of the SAD method when used by novice analysts. The findings show that individual analyst performance was average. However, pooling the individual analyst outputs into a group model increased the reliability and validity of the method. It is concluded that the SAD method's reliability and validity can be assured through the use of a structured process in which analysts first construct an individual model, followed by either another analyst pooling the individual results or a group process pooling individual models into an agreed group model. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cornelissen, M., McClure, R., Salmon, P. M., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Validating the Strategies Analysis Diagram: Assessing the reliability and validity of a formative method. Applied Ergonomics, 45(6), 1484–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free