Long-term findings on working memory neural dynamics in healthcare workers after mild COVID-19

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the long-term impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on cognitive function, even in mild cases, is critical to the well-being of individuals, especially for healthcare workers who are at increased risk of exposure to the virus. To the best of our knowledge, the electrophysiological activity underlying cognitive functioning has not yet been explored. Methods: Seventy-seven healthcare workers took part in the study (43 with mild infection about one year before the study and 34 uninfected). To assess cognitive status, event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioural responses were recorded while participants performed a working memory task. Results: COVID-19 participants exhibited a distinct neural pattern with lower parieto-occipital N1 amplitudes and higher frontal P2 amplitudes as compared to non-infected healthcare workers. We found no behavioural differences (reaction times and error rates) in working memory functioning between groups. Conclusions: This neural pattern suggests the presence of a decrement of processing resources linked to the encoding of sensory information (N1), followed by the enhanced of the P2 response which could be interpreted as the activation of compensation mechanism in COVID-19 participants. Significance: The current findings point out that ERPs could serve as valuable neural indices for detecting distinctive patterns in working memory functioning of COVID-19 participants, even in mild cases. However, further research is required to precisely ascertain the long-term cognitive effects of COVID-19 beyond one-year post-infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrera, D., Galán, D., Peláez, I., Carpio, A., Martín-Buro, M. C., & Mercado, F. (2024). Long-term findings on working memory neural dynamics in healthcare workers after mild COVID-19. Clinical Neurophysiology, 161, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.01.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free