Contrast Peripheral Phlebography and Pulmonary Angiography for Diagnosis of Thromboembolism

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

At one time, direct intravascular contrast angiography was the standard method for confirmatory diagnosis of venous or pulmonary arterial thromboembolism. Although sensitive and specific, conventional catheter-based contrast imaging is invasive and associated with a risk of phlebitis and thrombosis. These procedures require specialized training and experience in catheter manipulation, as well as specialized vascular imaging equipment. In current practice, less invasive techniques have largely superceded conventional angiography because they can be performed by technologists using widely available, multifunctional apparatus under physician supervision. When results using these newer approaches are inconclusive or impractical, however, catheter-based techniques are still relied on for definitive diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, techniques, and interpretations of contrast angiography as applied to venous thromboembolic disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrews, R. T. (2004, March 30). Contrast Peripheral Phlebography and Pulmonary Angiography for Diagnosis of Thromboembolism. Circulation. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000122872.86196.09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free