Cardiovascular responses to brief static contractions in man with topical nervous blockade.

20Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

1. We tested the hypothesis that afferent nerves from working muscles are important in determining the heart rate and blood pressure responses to brief maximal static exercise. 2. In twenty human subjects, the heart rate and arterial blood pressure responses to a brief maximal voluntary handgrip were studied before and after axillary nerve anaesthesia or to maximal one‐leg knee extension before and after epidural anaesthesia at L3‐L4. Maximal knee extension could not be accomplished without performing a ‘Valsalva‐like’ manoeuvre, but during handgrip it was possible to avoid the use of muscles other than those directly involved in the contraction. Heart rate and blood pressure were also monitored during a Valsalva manoeuvre of similar duration to the maximal voluntary contractions (4 s). 3. During handgrip with normal breathing, axillary nerve anaesthesia reduced the heart rate response but had no effect on the blood pressure response. 4. During a Valsalva manoeuvre, blood pressure increased but heart rate remained stable as long as expiratory pressure was maintained. During one‐leg knee extension, epidural anaesthesia reduced the blood pressure response; however, the reduction in blood pressure was probably due to a reduction in the simultaneously performed ‘Valsalva‐like’ manoeuvre. 5. The results of this study suggest that afferent input from the working muscles is of importance for the heart rate responses to brief static muscle contractions. That such influence may be important for the blood pressure response remains unproven. © 1989 The Physiological Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lassen, A., Mitchell, J. H., Reeves, D. R., Rogers, H. B., & Secher, N. H. (1989). Cardiovascular responses to brief static contractions in man with topical nervous blockade. The Journal of Physiology, 409(1), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017500

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free