Early experience in use of videolaryngoscopy by a neonatal pre-hospital and retrieval service

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To describe initial experience with use of the Glidescope Go videolaryngoscope by an Australian neonatal pre-hospital and retrieval service. Methods: We conducted a 31-month retrospective review of an airway registry for neonates intubated by MedSTAR Kids clinicians. Results: Twenty-two patients were intubated using the Glidescope Go, compared with 50 using direct laryngoscopy. First-pass success was 17/22 (77.3%) with the Glidescope Go and 38/50 (76%) with direct laryngoscopy. Complications occurred in 7/22 (32%) and 8/50 (16%), respectively. Conclusions: On initial review of this practice change, videolaryngoscopy allows neonatal tracheal intubation with a comparable success rate to direct laryngoscopy in a pre-hospital and retrieval setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacquiere, D., Smith, J., Bhanderi, N., Lockie, F., Pickles, J., Steere, M., … Mazur, S. (2024). Early experience in use of videolaryngoscopy by a neonatal pre-hospital and retrieval service. EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 36(3), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14374

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free