Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery

  • Serpa Neto A
  • Hemmes S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This individual patient meta-analysis of 2,127 patients ventilated under general anesthesia for surgery from 15 randomized controlled trials shows that intraoperative ventilation with low tidal volume protects against postoperative pulmonary complications, but further trials are necessary to define the role of intraoperative higher positive end–expiratory pressure to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Serpa Neto, A., Hemmes, S. N. T., Barbas, C. S. V., Beiderlinden, M., Biehl, M., … Schultz, M. J. (2015). Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery. Anesthesiology, 123(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free