What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?

43Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Repugnant Conclusion is an implication of some approaches to population ethics. It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living. (Parfit 1984: 388)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zuber, S., Venkatesh, N., Tännsjö, T., Tarsney, C., Orri Stefánsson, H., Steele, K., … Asheim, G. B. (2021). What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion? Utilitas, 33(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382082100011X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free