Abstract
The symbolic meaning individuals ascribe to Electric Vehicles (EVs) strongly predicts EV adoption intent. However, prior literature has been inconsistent in defining symbolic meaning. We assess two types of EV symbolic meaning and evaluate their influences on adoption intent: (1) public meaning (i.e., perceived EV expressiveness), and (2) private meaning (i.e., holding EV-congruent identities). We assess these relationships across two studies, in virtual and real EV test drive experiences (cumulative N = 729). Before and after the test drive, participants rated EV public and private meanings, as well as their post-drive adoption intent. Both studies find post-drive enhancements in private and public EV meanings. They also find that only changes in private meaning (i.e., reinforced identity) are associated with EV adoption intent, whereas enhancements in public meaning (i.e., enhanced perception of expressiveness) are not. These results are discussed in the context of Identity Based Motivation Theory. Limitations and implications are addressed.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Herziger, A., & Sintov, N. D. (2023). Give it a Try! How electric vehicle test drives influence symbolism perceptions and adoption intent. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101907
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.