A systematic investigation of computation models for predicting Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

15Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Early and accurate identification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is critically important for drug development and clinical safety. Computer-aided prediction of ADRs has attracted increasing attention in recent years, and many computational models have been proposed. However, because of the lack of systematic analysis and comparison of the different computational models, there remain limitations in designing more effective algorithms and selecting more useful features. There is therefore an urgent need to review and analyze previous computation models to obtain general conclusions that can provide useful guidance to construct more effective computational models to predict ADRs. Principal Findings: In the current study, the main work is to compare and analyze the performance of existing computational methods to predict ADRs, by implementing and evaluating additional algorithms that have been earlier used for predicting drug targets. Our results indicated that topological and intrinsic features were complementary to an extent and the Jaccard coefficient had an important and general effect on the prediction of drug-ADR associations. By comparing the structure of each algorithm, final formulas of these algorithms were all converted to linear model in form, based on this finding we propose a new algorithm called the general weighted profile method and it yielded the best overall performance among the algorithms investigated in this paper. Conclusion: Several meaningful conclusions and useful findings regarding the prediction of ADRs are provided for selecting optimal features and algorithms. © 2014 Kuang et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuang, Q., Wang, M. Q., Li, R., Dong, Y. C., Li, Y., & Li, M. (2014). A systematic investigation of computation models for predicting Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). PLoS ONE, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105889

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free