Identifying perinatal depression with case-finding instruments: a mixed-methods study (BaBY PaNDA – Born and Bred in Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy)

  • Littlewood E
  • Ali S
  • Dyson L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Perinatal depression is well recognised as a mental health condition but < 50% of cases are identified in routine practice. A case-finding strategy using the Whooley questions is currently recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to identify perinatal depression. Design: A prospective diagnostic accuracy cohort study, with concurrent qualitative and economic evaluations. Setting: Maternity services in England. Participants: A total of 391 pregnant women. Main outcome measures: Women completed the Whooley questions, EPDS and a diagnostic reference standard (Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised) during pregnancy (20 weeks) and postnatally (3–4 months). Qualitative interviews were conducted with health professionals (HPs) and a subsample of women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., Ansell, P., Bailey, D., … Gilbody, S. (2018). Identifying perinatal depression with case-finding instruments: a mixed-methods study (BaBY PaNDA – Born and Bred in Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy). Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(6), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free