Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: The ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial

290Citations
Citations of this article
207Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High platelet counts in essential thrombocythemia (ET) can be effectively lowered by treatment with either anagrelide or hydroxyurea. In 259 previously untreated, high-risk patients with ET, diagnosed according to the World Health Organization classification system, the efficacy and tolerability of anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea were investigated in a prospective randomized noninferiority phase 3 study in an a priori- ordered hypothesis. Confirmatory proof of the noninferiority of anagrelide was achieved after 6 months using the primary end point criteria and was further confirmed after an observation time of 12 and 36 months for platelet counts, hemoglobin levels, leukocyte counts (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gisslinger, H., Gotic, M., Holowiecki, J., Penka, M., Thiele, J., Kvasnicka, H. M., … Petrides, P. E. (2013). Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: The ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial. Blood, 121(10), 1720–1728. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-07-443770

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free