Comparing sterile bag rubbing and paint on technique in skin preparation of the hands

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare two techniques for surgical site skin preparation in hand surgery. Methods: We compared the standard sponge paint technique versus a plastic bag immersion technique using a 10% povidone-iodine with alcohol solution (Betadine, ORION Laboratories Pty Ltd, Balcatta, WA, Australia) to prepare surgical site skin for hand surgery. This sterile bag rubbing technique involves using a sterile plastic bag filled with 60mL of Betadine solution to immerse the subjects' hand. Samples were taken from 10 subjects for bacteria colony-forming unit (CFU) counts before and 3min after surgical site preparation in each group. Outcome measures were preparation time and CFU reduction with a plate impression test using commercially available agar slides. Results: The sterile bag rubbing technique significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) the time required for surgical site skin preparation (28s) compared with the standard technique (86s). Both techniques were found to have similar efficacy in the reduction of CFU. Conclusions: The sterile bag rubbing technique is a quicker alternative method for surgical site preparation in hand surgery and has comparable efficacy to the widely practised standard paint-on technique. © 2010 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2010 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chou, J., Choudhary, A., & Dhillon, R. S. (2011). Comparing sterile bag rubbing and paint on technique in skin preparation of the hands. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 81(9), 629–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05537.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free