Mechanisms, smoke and fun-house mirrors: when naming racism is not enough

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In this paper, I explain how public discourse around racism can hinder understanding of racist processes, becoming its own mechanism of racism. The general attribution of Flint's water crisis as a “clear case” of environmental racism, adopted by some state actors, serves as a key example. This ostensible progress in understanding can justify shutting off inquiry into underlying causes. Drawing on my experience studying racism in Michigan, describe how the production of collective tolerance for racial inequality is another essential mechanism reproducing racism. I build on research foregrounding the management of knowledge to explain how reactions including shock and inevitability can ultimately defang or coopt academic discourse. I conclude by suggesting ways researchers can navigate these obstacles, including by using the obstacles themselves as data. These methodological approaches will help researchers identify and counter hierarchies of credibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seamster, L. (2026). Mechanisms, smoke and fun-house mirrors: when naming racism is not enough. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 49(2), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2025.2570478

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free