A war of religion or a religion for war? The confessional element in the thirty years war

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, I intend to highlight how the confessional question was not, in fact, the underlying cause of the Thirty Years War. On the contrary, religion became the perfect instrument to provide ideological coverage for the conflict and to bring together different wills in a world imbued with a strong religious feeling. In this regard, precise examples are collected that weaken the confessional vision of war. Finally, we propose an explanation of why this interpretation has had (and still has) so much predicament among different historians and historiographical visions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Del Cerro, F. N. (2019). A war of religion or a religion for war? The confessional element in the thirty years war. Hipogrifo, 7(2), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.13035/H.2019.07.02.40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free