Forensic standardizations in torture and death in custody investigations

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Torture and death in custody have incurred rapid development as juridical subject in recent years in Europe, with the implementation of the European Convention of Human Rights. Evaluation of sufferance severity, which is the consequence of pathology with chronic evolution, the predictability of decompensation of a subclinical pathology, and translating these medical information on a scale measuring the severity of detention consequences, are all challenges for the modern detention healthcare system, in which most allegations of torture are due to lack of appropriate medical treatment administered to inmates. Where ethics are concerned, the main data difficulties are addressed in ethical conflicts between officials and experts of the parties and also between experts and judiciary officials who handle cases of torture or death in detention; this is why standardization is very important in such cases both in clinical expertise and in autopsies or exhumations. © 2012 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stan, C. (2012). Forensic standardizations in torture and death in custody investigations. Interventional Medicine and Applied Science, 4(4), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1556/imas.4.2012.4.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free