Assessment of the activity of a novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ analogue at recombinant human nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells

7Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The neuropeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous ligand for the nociceptin receptor (NOP). In an attempt to identify high potency NOP agonists for use in the brain we have compared the activity of a novel N/OFQ analogue [Phe1Ψ(CH2-O)Gly2]N/OFQ(1-13)NH 2 ([F/G-O]) with the existing [Phe1Ψ(CH2-NH)Gly2]N/OFQ(1-13)NH 2 ([F/G]). Both peptides are modified between the first two N-terminal amino acids and are further compared with the agonist template N/OFQ(1-13)NH2 in [3H]N/OFQ binding, GTPγ[35S] binding and cAMP inhibition studies using Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the recombinant human NOP. All peptides displaced [3H]N/OFQ, stimulated GTPγ[35S] binding and inhibited cAMP formation. In [3H]N/OFQ binding and GTPγ[35S] binding the rank order affinity and potency was N/OFQ(1-13)NH2>[F/G-O]>[F/G]. In GTPγ[35S] binding [F/G] was a clear partial agonist with intrinsic activity (Emax stimulation factor, mean±SEM, n=4) of 7.75±1.02 compared with N/OFQ(1-13)NH2 of 11.13±1.76. The efficacy of [F/G-O] (10.17±1.88) approached that of the full agonist N/OFQ(1-13)NH2. Downstream, at the level of cAMP formation, all peptides were full agonists with the following rank order potency: N/OFQ(1-13)NH2>[F/G-O]=[F/G]. The enhanced potency and intrinsic activity of the novel [F/G-O] modification makes this an interesting peptide for further in vivo analysis. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, K. E., McDonald, J., Barnes, T. A., Rowbotham, D. J., Guerrini, R., Calo’, G., & Lambert, D. G. (2003). Assessment of the activity of a novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ analogue at recombinant human nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00518-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free