Three-dimensional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Improved patient safety and surgeon convenience

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the aims of laparoscopic surgery is to improve upon the results obtained by open surgery. This clearly appears to have been achieved in bariatric surgery. Two dimensional (2-D) systems have been used to date, though new 3-dimensional (3-D) technologies have been introduced in an attempt to improve surgeon vision and thus increase the safety of the surgical techniques. Sixty obese patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy using a device equipped with 3-D optics allowing surgery to be viewed by the surgeon in 3 dimensions by using a specific monitor and wearing appropriate glasses. The mean patient age was 48.1 years. The mean weight was 114 kg (range, 92-172), with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44 ± 5.21 kg/m2. All surgeries were performed using the 3-D system, with a mean surgical time of 71 ± 49.6 minutes and a mean hospital stay of 3.0 ± 1.2 days. Only 1 intraoperative complication was recorded: retroperitoneal bleeding on insertion of the optical trocar. Over a mean follow-up period of 12 months, the mean body weight of the patients was 88 kg (range, 71-121), with a BMI of 30.56 ± 3.98 kg/m2 and a percentage excess weight loss of 68.14% ± 7.89%. There was clear improvement of both the blood pressure and glucose levels. Three-dimensional sleeve gastrectomy is safe, viable, and fully reproducible compared with 2-D surgery, improving visualization of the surgical field, safety, and surgeon convenience. Randomized studies involving larger patient samples are needed for the comparison of results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martínez-Ubieto, F., Jiménez-Bernadó, T., Martínez-Ubieto, J., Cabrerizo, A., Pascual-Bellosta, A., Muñoz-Rodriguez, L., & Jiménez-Bernadó, A. (2015). Three-dimensional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Improved patient safety and surgeon convenience. International Surgery, 100(6), 1134–1137. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00287.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free