Sublingual administration of furosemide: New application of an old drug

27Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In patients with decompensated heart failure, absorption of orally administered furosemide may be delayed, possibly leading to impaired pharmacodynamic effects. Sublingual administration may represent an alternative in such situations. Methods: In a crossover study including 11 healthy men, 20 mg furosemide was administered intravenously, orally and sublingually on three different days. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed from repeated blood and urine samples. Results: Compared with oral administration, sublingual administration was associated with 43% higher Cmax [difference 215 ng ml-1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37, 392], a higher urinary recovery (8.9 vs. 7.3 mg, difference 1.6 mg, 95% CI 0.3, 2.9), an 28% higher AUC (difference 328 ng h-1 ml-1, 95% CI 24, 632) and a higher bioavailability of furosemide (59 vs. 47%, difference 12.0%, 95% CI -1.2, 25.2). Sodium excretion was higher after sublingual compared with oral administration (peak excretion rate 1.8 vs. 1.4 mmol min-1, P < 0.05), whereas urine volume did not differ significantly between the two application modes. In comparison, intravenous administration showed the expected more rapid and intense response. Conclusion: Sublingually administered furosemide tablets differ in certain kinetic and dynamic properties from identical tablets given orally. Sublingual administration of furosemide may offer therapeutic advantages in certain groups of patients. © 2007 The Authors.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haegeli, L., Brunner-La Rocca, H. P., Wenk, M., Pfisterer, M., Drewe, J., & Krähenbühl, S. (2007). Sublingual administration of furosemide: New application of an old drug. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 64(6), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03035.x

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

52%

Researcher 11

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

56%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 7

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

19%

Materials Science 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0