To label or not to label: Balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa

0Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

There seems to be growing controversy among interest groups worldwide about whether genetically modified (GM) foods need to be labelled. There are also growing concerns, particularly among civil society groups, about the potential danger of GM foods, for which labels are being demanded. Particularly in Africa, the issue of labelling GM foods requires attention due to the rapid growth of agricultural biotechnology initiatives. Using Kenya as a case study, and based on interviews with key agricultural stakeholders and a review of the literature, we present five points to consider in discussions on how the need for mandatory GM labelling should be assessed. This framework encompasses, and is underpinned by, important considerations about ethics, consumer autonomy, costs, stigmatization, feasibility and food security as they pertain to agricultural biotechnology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oh, J., & Ezezika, O. C. (2014, April 23). To label or not to label: Balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa. Agriculture and Food Security. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-3-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free