Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: Influence of the application procedure

76Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compared the progression of sealed initial enamel lesions penetrated with a fissure sealant (Helioseal, Vivadent) or various adhesives (Heliobond, Excite, Vivadent; Resulcin, Merz; Solobond M, Voco; Prompt L-Pop, 3M-ESPE) after exposure to a demineralizing solution, in vitro. From 27 bovine teeth, 54 enamel specimens were prepared and covered with nail varnish (control), thus obtaining three windows for treatment. After demineralization (pH 5.0; 14 days), two of the windows (A, B) were etched with phosphoric acid (20%; 5 seconds); whereas, the third area served as the control (C). The specimens were divided randomly into six groups (n=9), and the material was applied (90 seconds) either once (A) or twice (B). Light-curing followed each application. Half of the area of each specimen window was then covered with nail varnish, and the samples were again stored in the demineralizing solution (pH 5.0; 14 days). The specimens were cut perpendicular to the surface, and both enamel slabs were studied after infiltration using a fluorescent, low viscous resin (VIRIN) and confocal microscopy (CLSM). Lesion depths were calculated (ImageJ) from the surface to that point in the lesion where the grey values clearly changed to a darker grey. After demineralization, mean lesion depths (SD) (14 days) were measured at 105 (21) μm. The second demineralization led to a mean progression of the lesion depths of 52 (31)%. Adper Prompt L-Pop and Solobond M could not significantly prevent lesion progression after a single application (p>0.05; -test); however, the second application of Solobond M significantly decreased lesion progression (p<0.05; t-test). Helioseal, Heliobond, Resulcin Monobond and Excite showed significantly better inhibition of the demineralization compared to the other materials (p<0.05; Bonferroni). It can be concluded that the penetration of adhesives into initial lesions inhibited a further demineralization in vitro. © Operative Dentistry, 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mueller, J., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Paris, S., Hopfenmuller, W., & Kielbassa, A. M. (2006). Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: Influence of the application procedure. Operative Dentistry, 31(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-39

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free