Quantitative immunohistochemical expression of c Kit in breast carcinomas is predictive of patients' outcome

18Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:c Kit (CD117) expression in tissues has been reported as a relevant target for specific therapy in some human malignancies, but has been poorly documented in breast carcinomasMethods:The prognostic significance of c Kit in a series of 924 breast carcinomas (mean follow-up, 79 months) was investigated using standardised high-throughput quantitative densitometry of immunohistochemical precipitates in tissue microarrays.Results:c Kit was expressed in 14.7% breast carcinomas (and in 42 out of 586 node-negative tumours). In univariate analysis, (log-rank test) the score of c Kit expression correlated with poor patient outcome P0.02 and particularly in node-negative cases (P0.002). In multivariate Cox analysis, c Kit was an indicator of metastasis independent of 25 other concomitantly evaluated markers of prognosis. Logistic regression showed that c Kit ranked 10 out of 25 (P0.041), and was included in a 10-marker signature that allowed 79.2% of the patients to be correctly classified in the metastatic or metastasis-free categories independently of hormone receptors and HER-2 status. Interestingly, c Kit was also a significant predictor of metastasis in node-negative tumours (2 out of 25 ranking, P0.0001) and included in a six-marker signature of prognosis, correctly classifying 88.6% of the patients (P0.0001).Conclusion:We concluded that, as assessed by quantitative immunohistochemistry, c Kit is an independent prognostic indicator that could also potentially serve as a target for specific therapy in breast carcinomas. © 2009 Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charpin, C., Giusiano, S., Charfi, S., Secq, V., Carpentier, S., Andrac, L., … Garcia, S. (2009). Quantitative immunohistochemical expression of c Kit in breast carcinomas is predictive of patients’ outcome. British Journal of Cancer, 101(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free