Contrasting effects of IRS-1 versus IRS-2 gene disruption on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in vivo

248Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To examine the impact of homozygous genetic disruption of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 (IRS-1 -/-) or IRS-2 (IRS-2 -/-) on basal and insulin-stimulated carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in vivo, we infused 18-h fasted mice (wild-type (WT), IRS-1 -/-, and IRS-2 -/-) with [3- 3H]glucose and [ 2H 5]glycerol and assessed rates of glucose and glycerol turnover under basal (0-90 min) and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (90-210 min; 5 mM glucose, and 5 milliunits of insulin·kg -1·min -1) conditions. Both IRS-1 -/- and IRS-2 -/- mice were insulin-resistant as reflected by markedly impaired insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose utilization compared with WT mice. Insulin resistance in the IRS-1 -/- mice could be ascribed mainly to decreased insulin-stimulated peripheral glucose metabolism. In contrast, IRS-2 -/- mice displayed multiple defects in insulin-mediated carbohydrate metabolism as reflected by (i) decreased peripheral glucose utilization, (ii) decreased suppression of endogenous glucose production, and (iii) decreased hepatic glycogen synthesis. Additionally, IRS-2 -/- mice also showed marked insulin resistance in adipose tissue as reflected by reduced suppression of plasma free fatty acid concentrations and glycerol turnover during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. These data suggest important tissue-specific roles for IRS-1 and IRS-2 in mediating the effect of insulin on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in vivo in mice. IRS-1 appears to have its major role in muscle, whereas IRS-2 appears to impact on liver, muscle, and adipose tissue.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Previs, S. F., Withers, D. J., Ren, J. M., White, M. F., & Shulman, G. I. (2000). Contrasting effects of IRS-1 versus IRS-2 gene disruption on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(50), 38990–38994. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006490200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free