Van der Waerden spaces and Hindman spaces are not the same

  • Kojman M
  • Shelah S
8Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A Hausdorff topological space X X is van der Waerden if for every sequence ( x n ) n ∈ ω (x_n)_{n\in \omega } in X X there is a converging subsequence ( x n ) n ∈ A (x_n)_{n\in A} where A ⊆ ω A\subseteq \omega contains arithmetic progressions of all finite lengths. A Hausdorff topological space X X is Hindman if for every sequence ( x n ) n ∈ ω (x_n)_{n\in \omega } in X X there is an IP-converging subsequence ( x n ) n ∈ F S ( B ) (x_n)_{n\in FS(B)} for some infinite B ⊆ ω B\subseteq \omega . We show that the continuum hypothesis implies the existence of a van der Waerden space which is not Hindman.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kojman, M., & Shelah, S. (2002). Van der Waerden spaces and Hindman spaces are not the same. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 131(5), 1619–1622. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-02-06916-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free