DDoD: Dual Denial of Decision Attacks on Human-AI Teams

10Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been increasingly used to make decision-making processes faster, more accurate, and more efficient. However, such systems are also at constant risk of being attacked. While the majority of attacks targeting AI-based applications aim to manipulate classifiers or training data and alter the output of an AI model, recently proposed sponge attacks against AI models aim to impede the classifier's execution by consuming substantial resources. In this work, we propose dual denial of decision (DDoD) attacks against collaborative human-AI teams. We discuss how such attacks aim to deplete both computational and human resources, and significantly impair decision-making capabilities. We describe DDoD on human and computational resources and present potential risk scenarios in a series of exemplary domains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tag, B., Van Berkel, N., Verma, S., Zhao, B. Z. H., Berkovsky, S., Kaafar, D., … Ohrimenko, O. (2023). DDoD: Dual Denial of Decision Attacks on Human-AI Teams. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 22(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2022.3218773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free