HIV treatment as prevention: Natural experiments highlight limits of antiretroviral treatment as HIV prevention

113Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is growing enthusiasm for increasing coverage of antiretroviral treatment among HIV-infected people for the purposes of preventing ongoing transmission. Treatment as prevention will face a number of barriers when implemented in real world populations, which will likely lead to the effectiveness of this strategy being lower than proposed by optimistic modelling scenarios or ideal clinical trial settings. Some settings, as part of their prevention and treatment strategies, have already attained rates of HIV testing and use of antiretroviral therapy-with high levels of viral suppression-that many countries would aspire to as targets for a treatment-as-prevention strategy. This review examines a number of these "natural experiments", namely, British Columbia, San Francisco, France, and Australia, to provide commentary on whether treatment as prevention has worked in real world populations. This review suggests that the population-level impact of this strategy is likely to be considerably less than as inferred from ideal conditions. © 2012 David P. Wilson.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, D. P. (2012, July). HIV treatment as prevention: Natural experiments highlight limits of antiretroviral treatment as HIV prevention. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free