New lumbar method for monitoring cerebrospinal fluid pressure in rats

26Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Monitoring cerebrospinal fluid pressure or intracranial pressure (ICP) is crucial in the study of neurosurgical disorders. In the present study, we report a new lumbar method for monitoring ICP in rats. Methods: A PE10 catheter connected to a pressure transducer was placed into the subarachnoid space of L5 through the duramater after laminectomy to record lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (lumbar-ICP). ICP at the cisterna magna (cisterna-ICP) was recorded simultaneously via a catheter in the subarachnoid space at the cisterna magna. Eighteen anesthetized adult male S-D rats were subjected to baseline recording followed by either experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) induced by intravascular puncture method or experimental intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) induced by blood injection with a stereotaxic system. Results: Baseline lumbar-ICP and cisterna-ICP varied between 6 and 8mmHg, and respiratory variation could be detected. A similar acute response to SAH was recorded in both the lumbar-ICP and cisterna-ICP in all rats. In rats subjected to SAH, the lumbar catheter continuously and accurately monitored lumbar-ICP, and reliable pressure tracings were obtained for up to 24h after SAH. However, continued cisterna-ICP monitoring was abandoned in two rats in the cisterna magna method due to obstruction of the catheter by blood clots (hematoma). Conclusion: This new lumbar-ICP method is simple, safe, easy, and reliable in rats. Continued lumbar-ICP measurements provided monitoring for up to 24h after experimental manipulation. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusaka, G., Calvert, J. W., Smelley, C., Nanda, A., & Zhang, J. H. (2004). New lumbar method for monitoring cerebrospinal fluid pressure in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 135(1–2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free