Moderator's view: Meta-analysis: the best knowledge but not always shining gold

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Meta-analysis has gained top status in medicine. Correctly so, well-performed meta-analysis is perceived as an unbeatable method for distilling first class medical knowledge. However, such a high status should in no way be considered as a guarantee that all information derived from meta-analyses is pure gold. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses not performed with due methodological attention abound and nephrology is not at all a protected territory. Herein I give concrete examples of meta-analyses published in major journals whose findings are not pure gold.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zoccali, C. (2016, June 24). Moderator’s view: Meta-analysis: the best knowledge but not always shining gold. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free