Consolidating Progress: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies

13Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Though governments historically have been a men's club, women are increasingly gaining access. We argue that democratic institutions are important drivers of women's inclusion in government. This stems from the rationales of autocratic versus democratic leaders when selecting ministers. Autocrats fear a coup by inner-circle elites, who are mostly men, incentivizing them to assign ministerial positions as co-optation. In contrast, democratic leaders are accountable to the citizenry through elections and must satisfy increasing demands for gender equality. Furthermore, we argue that it is historical experience with democracy that matters, rather than the level, as it takes time to create an even playing field, change attitudes, and generate trust in democracy. To support this, we contribute with the first study using the most comprehensive dataset, WhoGov, on women's access to cabinets. Overall, we show that democracy is a process that gradually enables women to enter the highest echelons of power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nyrup, J., Yamagishi, H., & Bramwell, S. (2024). Consolidating Progress: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies. American Political Science Review, 118(2), 724–743. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300062X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free