Choice-induced preference: A challenge for contrast

  • Eisenreich B
  • Hayden B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In his target article, Zentall asks: “to experience cognitive dissonance is it necessary for one to have conflicting beliefs or even beliefs at all?” He then argues that a simple behavioral process, the Within Trial Contrast Effect, may be sufficient to explain observed cognitive dissonance effects in nonhuman animals and possibly humans as well. We agree with Zentall that this effect is sufficient to explain many reported cognitive dissonance effects in nonhuman animals, but question its sufficiency for primate behavior (both monkeys and humans). Benjamin

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eisenreich, B. R., & Hayden, B. Y. (2017). Choice-induced preference: A challenge for contrast. Animal Sentience, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free