Purchasing evidence: The corollary of evidence based purchasing

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Summary: The National Health Service (NHS) market led to problems in funding research and development (R&D). The current policy is to resolve these by funding R&D through a national levy on purchasers. The policy does not, however, address the underlying problem that evidence produced by R&D is largely irrelevant to purchasers. The consequences of this policy are likely to be that purchasing will have limited impact in securing health gain most effectively, the progress and impact of R&D will be impaired, and its funding will remain insecure. If R&D and purchasing were integrated each could become more effective. This integration can be fostered through developing the regulation of purchasers and providers within the NHS market. © 1997, Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gray, S. F., Bevan, G., & Frankel, S. (1997). Purchasing evidence: The corollary of evidence based purchasing. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 19(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024589

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free