Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ® Instrument

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the VVSymQ® instrument, a new 5-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for symptoms of varicose veins. Method: The VVSymQ® electronic daily diary was administered to outpatients who received routine treatment for varicose veins (N = 40). Compliance with diary administration and item score variability, reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to change, and clinically meaningful change were evaluated. Results: Patients completed >97 % of scheduled diary assessments (at screening, baseline, and week 8). The VVSymQ® instrument captured patients’ pre-treatment symptoms (all VVSymQ® symptoms were endorsed by ≥75 % of patients at baseline), and the change post-treatment (mean change in score −6.1), with a large Cohen effect size (1.6). Test–retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.96); internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.76; baseline, week 8). VVSymQ® scores were more strongly associated with PRO scores that reflect symptoms and symptom impact (the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study—Quality of Life/Symptoms [VEINES-QOL/Sym] instrument and the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [CIVIQ-20]) than with PRO scores that reflect appearance (the Patient Self-Assessment of Appearance of Visible Varicose Veins [PA-V3]) or clinician-reported outcome scores (the Clinical–Etiology–Anatomy–Pathophysiology [CEAP] Classification of Venous Disorders and Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]), demonstrating construct validity. Patients reporting that symptoms were “moderately” or “much improved” on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) anchor (i.e., >97 % of patients) had mean improvements of −6.3 VVSymQ® points, while a cumulative distribution curve showed that 50 % of patients improved by ≥−5.8 points; thus, a score change of approximately −6 demonstrated a clinically meaningful change in this study. The clinically meaningful change in the VVSymQ® score was greater in patients with a greater baseline VVSymQ® symptom burden, and the VVSymQ® instrument captured clinically meaningful treatment benefit even in patients with a low baseline symptom burden. Conclusion: The 5-item VVSymQ® instrument is a brief, psychometrically sound, useful tool for evaluating patient-reported varicose veins symptoms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, D. D. I., Paty, J., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Bradbury, A. (2016). Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ® Instrument. Patient, 9(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free