Administrative exclusion: Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming

266Citations
Citations of this article
186Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Organizations operate as the gateway to public benefits. They are formally authorized to adjudicate claims, in the process interpreting and applying eligibility rules. Beyond their designated role, they also operate as informal gatekeepers, developing modes of operation that affect the ease or difficulty of claiming. Operational practices - both formally prescribed and informally created - can add hidden costs to claiming to the extent that they are complicated, confusing, or cumbersome. Individuals implicitly recognize these costs when they complain of being "tied up in red tape" or given the "bureaucratic run around." This inquiry examines whether these types of hidden organizational costs can have systematic effects, resulting in administrative exclusion - that is, nonparticipation attributable to organizational factors rather than claimant preferences or eligibility status. © The Author 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brodkin, E. Z., & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative exclusion: Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free