Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses

25Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Where reconstruction with autogenous tissue is contraindicated in craniofacial reconstruction, or declined by the patient, a prosthesis may be used. Originally made from latex, cellulose or acrylic resins, prostheses are now largely made of silicone. These prostheses were traditionally retained using adhesives, natural undercuts at retention sites or spectacles. However, these methods were unsatisfactory because of frequent loss of retention, skin reactions to adhesives or unnatural movements of the prosthesis. Osseointegration became a popular method of prosthesis retention, initially using a bar-and-clip device. The use of a bar attached to the implant has certain shortcomings, however, including rigidity of the prosthesis and the difficulty in maintaining hygiene at the implant site. We present our experience with the use of magnets to hold the prosthesis in place, which allows ease of use, improved hygiene and a more natural mobility of the prosthesis. © 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of The British Association of Plastic Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvi, R., McPhail, J., & Hancock, K. (2002). Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 55(8), 668–670. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2002.3962

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free