Choice of illumination system & fluorophore for multiplex immunofluorescenceon FFPE tissue sections

9Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recent availability of novel dyes and alternative light sources to facilitate complex tissue immunofluorescence studies such as multiplex labelling has not been matched by reports critically evaluating the considerations and relative benefits of these new tools, particularly in combination. Product information is often limited to wavelengths used for older fluorophores (FITC, TRITC & corresponding Alexa dyes family). Consequently, novel agents such as Quantum dots are not widely appreciated or used, despite highly favourable properties including extremely bright emission, stability and potentially reduced tissue autofluorescence at the excitation wavelength. Using spectral analysis, we report here a detailed critical appraisal and comparative evaluation of different light sources and fluorophores in multiplex immunofluorescence of clinical biopsy sections. The comparison includes mercury light, metal halide and 3 different LED-based systems, using 7 Qdots (525, 565, 585, 605, 625, 705), Cy3 and Cy5.We discuss the considerations relevant to achieving the best combination of light source and fluorophore for accuratemultiplex fluorescence quantitation. We highlight practical limitations and confounders to quantitation with filter-based approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prost, S., Kishen, R. E. B., Kluth, D. C., & Bellamy, C. O. C. (2016). Choice of illumination system & fluorophore for multiplex immunofluorescenceon FFPE tissue sections. PLoS ONE, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free