Abstract
The unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is an interesting and potentially beneficial procedure that remains a controversial alternative to total knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy. A critical review of the literature reveals inconsistent results using this compartmental approach to joint resurfacing. Many of the inconsistencies, however, are attributable to improper patient selection, poor component position, or inaccurate component alignment, leading to further degenerative changes and subsequent return of pain. The more recent studies, however, suggest better and more consistent results. The current indications for unicompartmental arthoplasty along with the ideal prosthetic qualifications are presented. To justify including this procedure as a sound alternative in the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee joint, however, further clinical studies are warranted.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wilcox, P. G., & Jackson, D. W. (1986). Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Review. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b10.36542
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.