Impact of different nose lengths on flow-field structure around a high-speed train

29Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, the time-averaged and instantaneous slipstream velocity, time-averaged pressure, wake flows, and aerodynamic force of a high-speed train (HST) with different nose lengths are compared and analyzed using an improved delayed detached-eddy simulation (IDDES) method. Four train models were selected, with nose lengths of 4, 7, 9, and 12 m. To verify the accuracy of the numerical simulation results, they were compared with wind tunnel test results. The comparison results show that the selection of the numerical simulation method is reasonable. The research results show that with increasing nose length, the peak values of the time-averaged slipstream velocity of the trackside position (3 m from the center of track and 0.2 m from the top of rail) and the platform position (3 m from the center of track and 0.2 m from the top of rail) decrease continuously, and show a trend of rapid reduction at first, and then a slow decrease. As the nose length increased from 4 to 12 m, the time-averaged slipstream velocity at the trackside position and platform position are decreased by 57% and 19.5%, respectively. At a height of 1.6 m from the top of the rail, ΔCP max max (maximum pressure coefficient), pipeΔCP minpipe (the absolute value of minimum pressure coefficient), and ΔCP (pressure change coefficient) decrease with increasing nose length, which is similar to the peak value of time-averaged slipstream velocity, decreasing rapidly at first and then slowly. As the nose length increased from 4 to 12 m, decreases of ΔCP max, pipeΔCP minpipe, and ΔCP by 26.5%, 58.5%, and 44.8% were shown, respectively. Different nose lengths also have a significant impact on wake flow.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., Chen, G., Zhou, D., & Chen, Z. (2019). Impact of different nose lengths on flow-field structure around a high-speed train. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214573

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free