Abstract
Introduction: Evidence suggests that patients with fragility fractures would benefit from post-acute care (PAC); however, they have been subjected to varying PAC programs. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of home-based PAC (HPAC) to inpatient PAC (IPAC) programs for patients with fragility fractures in Taiwan. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of patients who received HPAC or IPAC within three weeks after hip, knee, or spine fragility fractures in the Taipei City Hospital from September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018. Results: The mean age (78.9 ± 10.8 years) showed significant difference between the HPAC (age = 80.6 ± 11.1, n = 83) and the IPAC (age = 78.2 ± 10.6, n = 185) groups (P =.049). After PAC, both HPAC and IPAC groups showed improvement on Barthel index, numerical pain rating scale, and Harris hip score (all P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lee, M. C., Woung, L. C., Tsauo, J. Y., Shih, S. L., Chen, H. M., Chu, D. C., & Huang, S. J. (2022). Comparison of Highly Intensive Home-Based Post-acute Care to Inpatient Program for Patients With Fragility Fractures After Surgery. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221081376
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.