Comparison of Highly Intensive Home-Based Post-acute Care to Inpatient Program for Patients With Fragility Fractures After Surgery

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence suggests that patients with fragility fractures would benefit from post-acute care (PAC); however, they have been subjected to varying PAC programs. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of home-based PAC (HPAC) to inpatient PAC (IPAC) programs for patients with fragility fractures in Taiwan. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of patients who received HPAC or IPAC within three weeks after hip, knee, or spine fragility fractures in the Taipei City Hospital from September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018. Results: The mean age (78.9 ± 10.8 years) showed significant difference between the HPAC (age = 80.6 ± 11.1, n = 83) and the IPAC (age = 78.2 ± 10.6, n = 185) groups (P =.049). After PAC, both HPAC and IPAC groups showed improvement on Barthel index, numerical pain rating scale, and Harris hip score (all P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, M. C., Woung, L. C., Tsauo, J. Y., Shih, S. L., Chen, H. M., Chu, D. C., & Huang, S. J. (2022). Comparison of Highly Intensive Home-Based Post-acute Care to Inpatient Program for Patients With Fragility Fractures After Surgery. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221081376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free