Hierarchy salience and social action: disentangling class, status, and authority in world politics

22Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hierarchy is a persistent feature of international politics. Existing accounts recognize that there are many ways in which actors can stand in relation to one another. Yet they struggle to make sense of this complexity. This study considers Max Weber’s contribution to understanding international hierarchy. It discusses three ideal types of stratification based on the distribution of capabilities (class), estimations of honor and prestige (status), and command relationships (authority). Following the neo-Weberian approach, these dimensions matter because they make social action intelligible. Furthermore, Weber clarifies how class and status are connected and how these two dimensions relate to authority through the process of ‘social closure’. The study concludes that scholars who focus exclusively on authority structures miss the fact that authority typically derives from other forms of stratification: although based on different logics of social stratification, class and status hierarchies often coalesce into (legitimate) authority.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulz, C. A. (2019). Hierarchy salience and social action: disentangling class, status, and authority in world politics. International Relations, 33(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818803434

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free