Effectiveness of allergic rhinitis treatments in real-life with a focus on MP-AzeFlu

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For any allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment, it is crucial to provide evidence not only of efficacy (assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) but also of effectiveness in real-life. Observational studies provide valuable data on the use and results associated with interventions prescribed in real-life. However, real-life evidence supporting available AR treatment options is sparse with effectiveness only established for oral antihistamines (desloratadine, ebastine), intranasal corticosteroids (mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate (FP)), allergen immunotherapy and omalizumab. A novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and FP in a single spray (MP-AzeFlu) shows great promise, with the effectiveness observed in real-life exceeding that noted in RCTs. This review summarises real-life data on MP-AzeFlu, which provides rapid and sustained symptom control irrespective of patient age, AR phenotype or disease severity. We call for high quality real-life research in addition to RCTs to inform future AR treatment guidelines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klimek, L., Demoly, P., & Price, D. (2016). Effectiveness of allergic rhinitis treatments in real-life with a focus on MP-AzeFlu. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 9(5), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1586/17512433.2016.1148598

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free