Sustained Effectiveness of Cilostazol After Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: Midterm Follow-up From the Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) Study

23Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the midterm safety and effectiveness of cilostazol treatment in claudicant patients undergoing endovascular therapy. Methods: The Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00912756; University Hospital Medical Information Network identifier UMIN000002091) enrolled 200 patients (mean age 73 years; 131 men) treated for femoropopliteal disease from March 2009 to April 2011 at 13 cardiovascular centers in Japan. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive oral aspirin with or without cilostazol. Of the 100 patients assigned to the 2 treatment groups, 7 patients in the cilostazol group and 2 patients in the no-cilostazol group were withdrawn from the study without undergoing endovascular treatment, leaving 93 patients in the cilostazol group and 98 patients in the no-cilostazol group for follow-up analysis. The primary outcome measure was primary patency; secondary outcome measures were freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and overall survival. Outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis using the Kaplan-Meier method; estimates were compared with the log-rank test. Results: The median follow-up was 38.1 months (interquartile range 25.1, 47.7). Among the 93 subjects in the cilostazol group, 7 died and 26 withdrew from administration 1 year after the endovascular procedure. Discontinuation of cilostazol was not a significant factor for restenosis. Primary patency was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the no-cilostazol group (69% vs 54%, p=0.026) at 3 years. The cilostazol group also had better 3-year freedom from CD-TLR (78% vs 63%, p=0.014), although overall survival estimates did not differ significantly (p=0.95). Conclusion: These results suggest that the safety and effectiveness of cilostazol treatment were sustained in patients with femoropopliteal disease undergoing endovascular treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soga, Y., Hamasaki, T., Edahiro, R., Iida, O., Inoue, N., Suzuki, K., … Aodo, K. (2018). Sustained Effectiveness of Cilostazol After Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: Midterm Follow-up From the Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) Study. Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 25(3), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602818771358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free