Abstract
This report extends and updates an ongoing program of research analyzing Americans interpretations of and responses to climate change. The research segments the American public into six audiences that range along a spectrum of concern and issue engagement from the Alarmed, who are convinced of the reality and danger of climate change, and who are highly supportive of personal and political actions to mitigate the threat, to the Dismissive, who are equally convinced that climate change is not occurring and that no response should be made. The Six Americas are not very different demographically, but are dramatically different in their beliefs and actions, as well as their basic values and political orientations. The groups were first identified in a nationally representative survey conducted in the fall of 2008, and were re-assessed in January and June of 2010. The current report is the fourth in the series; in it we provide new insights into the informational needs of the six groups, their understanding of the health impacts of global warming, beliefs about current environmental impacts of global warming in the U.S., and support for local adaptation and mitigation policies. All prior reports may be accessed at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/ and http://climatechange.gmu.edu.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Abbott, A. (2005). Survey questions safety of alternative medicine. Nature, 436(7053), 898–898. https://doi.org/10.1038/436898b
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.