Comparison of newtonian and special-relativistic trajectories with the general-relativistic trajectory for a low-speed weak-gravity system

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We show, contrary to expectation, that the trajectory predicted by general-relativistic mechanics for a low-speed weak-gravity system is not always well-approximated by the trajectories predicted by special-relativistic and Newtonian mechanics for the same parameters and initial conditions. If the system is dissipative, the breakdown of agreement occurs for chaotic trajectories only. If the system is non-dissipative, the breakdown of agreement occurs for chaotic trajectories and non-chaotic trajectories. The agreement breaks down slowly for non-chaotic trajectories but rapidly for chaotic trajectories. When the predictions are different, general-relativistic mechanics must therefore be used, instead of special-relativistic mechanics (Newtonian mechanics), to correctly study the dynamics of a weak-gravity system (a low-speed weak-gravity system). © 2012 Liang, Lan.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, S. N., & Lan, B. L. (2012). Comparison of newtonian and special-relativistic trajectories with the general-relativistic trajectory for a low-speed weak-gravity system. PLoS ONE, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034720

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free