Response to comment on 'A conserved strategy for inducing appendage regeneration in moon jellyfish, Drosophila, and mice'

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previously we reported evidence that a regenerative response in the appendages of moon jellyfish, fruit flies, and mice can be promoted by nutrient modulation (Abrams et al., 2021). Sustar and Tuthill subsequently reported that they had not been able to reproduce the induced regenerative response in flies (Sustar and Tuthill, 2023). Here we discuss that differences in the amputation method, treatment concentrations, age of the animals, and stress management explain why they did not observe a regenerative response in flies. Typically, 30-50% of treated flies showed response in our assay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y., Sarma, A. A., Lee, I. T., Tan, F. H., Abrams, M. J., Condiotte, Z. J., … Goentoro, L. (2023). Response to comment on “A conserved strategy for inducing appendage regeneration in moon jellyfish, Drosophila, and mice.” ELife, 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free