Miniscrews and Mini-Implants Success Rates in Orthodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Several Clinical Parameters

  • Beltrami R
  • Sfondrini F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study selection criteria The selection criteria were as follows: • human studies with minimum samples sizes of 5 (In vitro studies, animal studies, case reports, technique articles, opinion papers reviews and in-vitro studies were excluded). • randomized controlled trial and nonrandomized studies with low or moderate risk of bias. • implants with a diameter <2.5 mm (larger implants would not classify for specific orthodontic indications, e.g., interradicular positioning). • orthodontic forces acting for a minimum of 3 months. Success was selected as the primary outcome. An orthodontic mini-implant was considered successful when it could be loaded with orthodontic forces and fulfill its anchorage objectives during a minimum period of 4 months. Orthodontic mini-implants, that were lost or had become unusable, were considered to be failures. This

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beltrami, R., & Sfondrini, F. (2015). Miniscrews and Mini-Implants Success Rates in Orthodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Several Clinical Parameters. Dentistry, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1122.1000346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free