Prognostic factors for the outcome of Bells' palsy: A cohort register-based study

36Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: There is a lack of data on patients' and diagnostic factors for prognostication of complete recovery in patients with Bell's palsy. Design and setting: Cohort register-based study of 368 patients with Bell's palsy and uniform diagnostics and standardised treatment in a university hospital from 2007 to 2017 (49% female, median age: 51 years). Main outcome measures: Clinical data, facial grading, electrodiagnostics, motor function tests, non-motor function tests and onset of prednisolone therapy were assessed for their impact on the probability of complete recovery using univariable and multivariable statistics. Results: Median onset of treatment was 1.5 days. 46% of patients had a House-Brackmann scale at baseline of ≥ III. The median recovery time was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-3.0). 54.9% achieved a complete recovery. If prednisolone therapy started later than 96 hours after onset, the recovery rate decreased significantly. Beyond less severe palsy, no abnormal electroneurography side difference, no pathological spontaneous activity in electromyography and normal stapedius reflex testing were the most powerful tool for prognostication of recovery after Bell's palsy. Conclusion: Beyond severity of the palsy, facial electrodiagnostics and stapedius reflex testing are the most powerful tool for prognostication of recovery time after Bell's palsy. Prednisolone therapy should have started at best within a time window of 96 hours after onset to reach the highest probability of complete recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urban, E., Volk, G. F., Geißler, K., Thielker, J., Dittberner, A., Klingner, C., … Guntinas-Lichius, O. (2020). Prognostic factors for the outcome of Bells’ palsy: A cohort register-based study. Clinical Otolaryngology, 45(5), 754–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free