Assessment of flexural strength and fracture of orthodontic mini-implants

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study is to assess both deformation and fracture of orthodontic mini-implants of different trade marks by submitting them to loads perpendicularly applied along their lengths. Methods: A total of 75 mini-implants were divided into five groups (n = 15) according to their manufacturers: group M (Mondeal, Tuttlingen, Germany), group N (Neodent, Curitiba, Brazil), group I (INP, São Paulo, Brazil), group S (SIN, São Paulo, Brazil), and group F (Titanium Fix, São José dos Campos, Brazil). The mini-implants were perpendicularly inserted into swine cortical bones and then submitted to mechanical tests by using a universal testing machine (Emic DL 10.000) at cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. The force required for deforming and fracturing the mini-implants at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0mm was assessed. Data were assessed by using variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. Results: Mini-implants of group S were found to need higher forces to be deformed and fractured in comparison with other groups whose mini-implants were submitted to lower forces, a result that is statistically significant (p < 0.05). Group M showed the lowest values regarding deformation with no statistical difference compared to group N (p > 0.05), whereas group T had the lowest values regarding fracture with statistical differences compared to groups M, S, and I. Conclusions: Based on the present study, one can conclude that the shape of the mini-implants is directly related to their flexural strength. Despite the differences reported above, the mini-impiants were found to be clinically useful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pithon, M. M., Nojima, L. I., Nojima, M. G., & Ruellas, A. C. de O. (2008). Assessment of flexural strength and fracture of orthodontic mini-implants. Revista Dental Press de Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial, 13(5), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-54192008000500013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free