An intutionistic approach based on failure mode and effect analysis for prioritizing corrective and preventive strategies

49Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a prominent approach that has been used with convenience as the most popular risk definition and evaluation tool related to a system, a product, or a service, it has several deficiencies. This study addresses these deficiencies and proposes a new intuitionistic approach, which combines FMEA and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) by implementing a new intuitionistic scale. Intuitionistic FMEA-WASPAS can handle uncertainty, vagueness, and hesitancy of the risk evaluation process and provides flexibility for risk assessment. In this study, rankings of corrective-preventive strategies for failure modes (FMs) are obtained by the proposed approach. To compute Intuitionistic Fuzzy Risk Priority Numbers, occurrence, severity, detection, cost, duration of exposure, and system safety factors are used. A numerical example is also illustrated to present the practicality and effectiveness of the Intuitionistic FMEA-WASPAS approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Can, G. F. (2018). An intutionistic approach based on failure mode and effect analysis for prioritizing corrective and preventive strategies. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 28(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20729

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free